
|

Prayer
Requests
Got
Questions?
Contact Us:
Mail
P.O. Box 1146
Grapevine, TX 76099
Tel 817.481.3335
Fax 817.481.8123
Email
info@stlaurencechurch.org
Location
519 N. Kimball Av
Southlake, TX 76092
See Map Here
|

|
|
|
|

Bishop
Iker's Address to the Convention
|
|
SATURDAY,
NOVEMBER 17, 2007
|
|
Greetings and welcome in
the name of our Lord
Jesus Christ to this
25th Annual Convention
of the Episcopal Diocese
of Fort Worth. It
promises to be a
momentous one, with long
lasting implications for
all of us.
I would like to set
the tone for our
deliberations today by
beginning with a quote
from St. Paul the
Apostle in the 16th
chapter of his First
Letter to the
Corinthians: “Be
watchful, stand firm in
your faith, be
courageous, be strong.
Let all that you do be
done in love.”
(I
Corinthians 16:13-14)
What a wonderful text to
guide and direct us as
we debate the proposals
that are before this
Convention.
First, there is a
warning - a warning that
we must be watchful, for
not everything we hear
today will be good
counsel or of God. Some
will seek to mislead us
or perhaps even
intimidate us.
Some will argue that we
do not need to take any
action, to leave well
enough alone, to go
along, in order to get
along. Beware of those
who would lull us into
complacency in the face
of attacks and assaults
on biblical orthodoxy in
our Church. St. Peter
cautions us in the same
way in his First
Epistle: “Be sober, be
watchful. Your adversary
the devil prowls around
like a roaring lion,
seeking someone to
devour. Resist him, firm
in your faith.”
(I
Peter 5:8-9a)
Wherever Christians
gather to take a stand
for the Gospel, even in
church conventions, the
devil will be close at
hand, seeking to
beguile, divide, and
mislead. Watch out!
|
|
Second, there is an
exhortation - an
exhortation to stand
firm in the faith, the
faith that we have
received, the faith of
the apostles, “the faith
which was once for all
delivered to the
saints,” to quote verse
3 of St. Jude’s Epistle.
We must contend for the
faith, resisting and
repudiating the
persuasive innovations
of those who pervert the
grace of God into
immorality and deny the
uniqueness of the Lord
Jesus Christ, who is the
Way, the Truth, and the
Life. In every age and
in our own day, there
are those who would
twist and reinterpret
the biblical faith so as
to be make it more man
pleasing and less
offensive to the
contemporary secular
world. Counterfeit
Christianity, man-made
religion, and
revisionist theology
must be identified and
rebuked for the sake of
the unchanging Gospel of
our Lord Jesus Christ.
In the Epistle reading
just this past Sunday,
St. Paul exhorted us to
“stand firm and hold to
the traditions which you
were taught by us,
either by word of mouth
or by letter.”
(II Thessalonians 2:15)
Those traditions of
which he speaks involve
the doctrinal, moral,
liturgical and
theological teachings of
the apostles and are the
core of what we know as
the Apostolic Tradition
of the catholic faith.
Sadly, tradition has
become a bad word in
many quarters of the
Episcopal Church, where
the historic, biblical
position is often
ridiculed, persecuted,
and dismissed as
irrelevant and
hopelessly out of date
for today’s world.
St. Paul does not mince
words about the
importance of standing
firm in the true faith
when he writes to the
Galatians: “As we have
said before, so now I
say again, If any one is
preaching to you a
gospel contrary to that
which you received, let
him be accursed. Am I
now seeking the favor of
men, or of God? Or am I
trying to please men?
If I were still pleasing
men, I should not be a
servant of Christ.”
(Galatians 1:9-10)
Let us today take a
strong stand to remain
firm in the faith we
have received.
Third, there is the
call for us to be
courageous and strong.
This is never easy, my
friends, especially when
we are faced by angry
opponents and threats of
retaliation. This
Convention is being very
carefully watched today,
to see if we have the
courage of our
convictions. Are we
willing to stand up and
be counted when
threatened by litigation
and lawsuits? When
warned of inhibitions
and depositions? When
intimidated with threats
of replacement
strategies to remove
entire Standing
Committees, replace the
legitimate diocesan
authorities, and indeed
even to reconstitute
new, shadow Conventions
in place of the current,
constitutional one? Let
our “yes” be “yes,” and
let our “no” be “no,”
not a garbled yes and no
at the same time. Let us
not lose our will to
stand for conscience and
truth, whatever the
consequences or the
cost. Dare to be a
Daniel! Dare to
stand alone, if need be!
But we are not alone; we
are together.And there
are many others who
stand with us and who
look to us, having made
a stand on many previous
occasions, when all the
threatening and
intimidating and
ridiculing is done – to
stand firm in the Lord
Jesus Christ, with
courage and boldness,
and perseverance, not in
our own strength, but
strong in the grace and
the power of the Holy
Spirit of God. What
better words for the
clergy and laity of this
diocese than the word of
God to Joshua: “Be
strong and of good
courage; be not
frightened, neither be
dismayed; for the Lord
your God is with you
wherever you go.”
(Joshua 1:9) It
was a time such as this,
a time of choice about
the future, a time of
anxiety about what lies
ahead, a time to decide
to leave the past behind
and move forward, that
Joshua put it to the
people of Israel before
entering the Promised
Land: “Choose this day
whom you will serve…but
as for me and my house,
we will serve the Lord.”
Choose this day, Fort
Worth, choose to make
and secure a spiritual
future for your children
and your grandchildren
in the church of
tomorrow. Be courageous
and strong, and don’t
look back!
Fourth and last,
there is the earnest
appeal – “let all that
you do be done in love.”
Let our watchfulness be
done in love, even love
for our enemies and our
persecutors. Let our
firmness in faith be
matched by our
commitment to love –
love for those who
oppose us, love for
those who have strayed
from the faith, love for
members of the same
household who disagree
with us and differ from
us. Let our courage and
boldness be expressed in
love for all sinners,
love for those who
threaten us, showing the
sacrificial love of
Jesus for a fallen world
and for all people,
created in the image of
God. Let us speak the
truth in love, not
seeking revenge or harm
to anyone, but only the
glory of God, the
building up of the Body
of Christ, and the
extension of Christ’s
kingdom in the world.
Pray God that our
debates and decisions
this day may be marked
by the love of Jesus
Christ. The Apostle Paul
reminds us: “Love is
patient and kind; love
is not jealous or
boastful; it is not
arrogant or rude. Love
does not insist on its
own way; it is not
irritable or resentful;
it does not rejoice at
wrong, but rejoices in
the right. Love bears
all things, believes all
things, hopes all
things, endures all
things.”
(I
Corinthians 13:4-7)
Whatever comes of our
decisions today, let us
debate in love, decide
in love, and deal with
one another in love, as
we face the consequences
of choices we must make.
It is within this
biblical and spiritual
context, then, that we
consider the weighty
proposals that are
before us at this
Convention. We are
mindful that the
organizing, primary
Convention of a new, as
yet unnamed, diocese was
held 25 years ago this
week, on Nov. 13, 1982,
at All Saints’ Episcopal
Day School, here in Fort
Worth. A Special
Convention of the
Diocese of Dallas on
June 19, 1982, approved
the request of the
Bishop, The Rt. Rev. A.
Donald Davies, to divide
the Diocese in order to
form a new one in the
western portion. The
General Convention met
in September of that
year and likewise
concurred. As you know,
Bishop Davies chose to
go with the new Diocese
and became our first
Bishop, presiding at our
very first Convention. A
committee had suggested
three possible names for
the new Diocese, which
up to that point had
simply been referred to
as “the western
diocese.” The proposed
choices were the Diocese
of Fort Worth, the
Diocese of Central
Texas, and the Diocese
of the Rio Brazos de
Dios. Canon James
DeWolfe of All Saints’
Church in Fort Worth
suggested the name be
the Diocese of the
Trinity. A vote was
taken, and we all know
the results. We chose to
be known as the Diocese
of Fort Worth.
Appointments were made,
elections were held, and
a budget was approved. A
Constitution and Canons
were adopted, and a
resolution was approved
to accede to the
Constitution and Canons
of the Episcopal Church,
in order to “be admitted
into union with the
General Convention.”
|
|
Before proceeding, I
would like to take a
moment to acknowledge
and honor those who are
present with us today
who were participants in
that historic Primary
Convention held 25 years
ago. Would you please
stand? Thank you, and
God bless you.
At issue in this
Convention today are
constitutional and
canonical decisions
about how we shall chart
our course as a Diocese
for the next 25 years
and beyond. We are
preparing a future for
our children and our
grandchildren. As you
know, by way of
background, the
chancellor to the
Presiding Bishop, wrote
my chancellor on Oct.
19, 2006, declaring that
certain provisions in
our diocesan
Constitution and Canons
were contrary to those
of the Episcopal Church
and needed to be
changed, or else the
Presiding Bishop would
“have to consider what
sort of action she must
take in order to bring
your diocese into
compliance.” The
following month, on Nov.
15, the Executive
Council of the General
Convention received a
task force report
identifying Fort Worth
as a “problem diocese”
that needed to be
monitored. On June 14,
2007, this same
Executive Council
declared certain
constitutional and
canonical amendments in
this Diocese to be “null
and void.” Our Standing
Committee and I replied
by pointing out that
such declarations
exceeded the authority
of the Executive
Council, which is
responsible for the
program and budget of
the General Convention,
and that they had no
legislative or judicial
authority to make such a
pronouncement. The
Council’s declaration
about the legitimate
legislative process in
this Diocese is, in
fact, null and void.
And then just last
week, the Presiding
Bishop sent me an open
letter, that she quickly
posted on the internet,
threatening disciplinary
action against me if I
did not prevent this
Convention from acting
on certain legislative
proposals. I believe all
of you have seen my
reply. What you may not
have seen is the
Episcopal News Service
story saying that if I
did not heed her warning
it would (and I quote)
“force her to take
action to bring the
diocese and its
leadership into line
with the mandates of the
national Church.” Now
hold on there a minute.
I don’t want to force
her to do anything, but
I must object to the
claim that the Presiding
Bishop has any canonical
authority in this
Diocese or any
legitimate power over
the leadership of this
Diocese. She has
no authority to bring
Fort Worth into line
with the mandates of a
so-called “national
Church.” There is no
such thing as “the
national Church.” We are
a confederation of
Dioceses, related to
each other by our
participation in General
Convention. From the
earliest days of the
beginnings of the
Episcopal Church in this
country, including the
formation of dioceses
and eventually the
creation of the General
Convention itself, there
has been a strong
mistrust of centralized
authority that is deeply
rooted in our history as
Episcopalians. We do not
have an Archbishop in
this Church, who has
authority over other
Bishops and their
Dioceses. Instead, we
have a Presiding Bishop,
with very limited
canonical
responsibilities, mainly
administrative in
nature. We must object
to the tendency in
recent years in this
Church to create some
sort of central
bureaucracy at the top
that holds power and
authority over the
various Dioceses of this
Church. We do not
have a Curia that
dictates policy and
dogma in this Church.
We do not have a
Presiding Bishop with
papal authority over us,
nor do we believe in the
infallibility of any
Bishop or any council
or, indeed, of any
General Convention. If I
may be so bold to speak
on your behalf, dear
friends: the leadership
of this Diocese does not
need to be brought into
line with the mandates
of some mythical
“national Church.”
|
|
Let us now turn to
the first two proposals
we will consider today.
Proposed Constitutional
Amendment A would have
us delete that portion
of Article 1 that
stipulates that “no
action of General
Convention which is
contrary to Holy
Scripture and the
Apostolic Teaching of
the Church shall be of
any force or effect in
this Diocese.” In other
words, we are being
asked to declare that we
will conform to and obey
the dictates of the
General Convention even
when we believe they are
contrary to the Bible
and to the Apostolic
Teaching of the one,
holy, catholic and
apostolic Church.
Proposed
Constitutional Amendment
B addresses the issue of
the ownership of church
property in this
Diocese. It would have
us declare that all our
churches are really
owned by The Episcopal
Church, not by this
Diocese or by our
parishes. It would
declare that if we
belong to TEC, then
we are owned and
controlled by TEC. Such
an understanding is
contrary to the
Constitution of this
Diocese, as it has
existed since its
original adoption in
1982. The title to all
church property in this
Diocese is held in the
name of the Corporation
of the Episcopal Diocese
of Fort Worth, for the
beneficial use of our
parishes and missions.
Never once, in the
entire history of this
Diocese, has the Bishop,
the Standing Committee,
or the Board of Trustees
of the Corporation ever
sought (or ever needed)
the consent or approval
of any person or church
body outside this
Diocese to buy, sell or
encumber any of our
properties. We
have never needed the
authorization of any
other authority,
ecclesiastical or
otherwise, outside this
Diocese, in order to
start churches, to close
churches, to move
churches, or even to
sell churches, and we
don’t intend to start
doing so now.
All of the other
Proposed Constitutional
Amendments coming before
us are sponsored by the
Standing Committee and
are unanimously endorsed
by the Committee on
Constitution and Canons.
Explanations and the
rationale behind these
proposals have been put
before all of you in
writing. They have
been thoroughly
discussed in your
deanery meetings, in
parish forums, in vestry
meetings, and in various
other formats.
Today they will be
debated, prayed over,
and then voted upon.
However, as you well
know, they would not
become effective until
or unless they were
ratified on second
reading at our Annual
Convention in 2008.
|
|
It is important for
this Convention to
remember what the
Standing Committee wrote
to us in September as a
kind of preamble to the
proposals that are
before us:
“The Episcopal
Diocese of Fort Worth
has always been a
traditional,
conservative diocese,
adhering to the beliefs
and practices of the
historic catholic faith.
This means it has often
found itself in conflict
with decisions of the
General Convention,
which has continued a
series of innovations in
liturgy, theology, and
the sacraments. For 25
years, the diocese has
attempted to
differentiate itself
from the actions of the
General Convention and
its ongoing effort to
revise and redefine the
historic teaching of the
Church on faith and
morals, as revealed in
Holy Scripture.
To submit to and
comply with the current
direction of the General
Convention would mean
for us to embrace a
distortion of the
Christian faith that our
forebears would not
recognize as a
continuation of ‘the
Apostles’ teaching and
fellowship.’ It would
mean driving an even
deeper wedge between us
and the rest of the
Anglican Communion, as
well as other Christian
bodies, who do not
condone recent actions
of the General
Convention, but rather
view them as schismatic
and sectarian. We cannot
act against our
conscience and in
violation of the faith
once delivered to the
saints.”
In concluding their
report, the Standing
Committee wrote:
“We believe it is
time for us to take
action to secure our
future as a diocese. We
believe it is time to
separate our diocese
from General Convention
religion and to join an
orthodox Province of the
Anglican Communion.
However, we do not wish
to compel any parish in
the diocese to remain
with us as we pursue
this course of action.
With Christian charity
toward those who differ
from the majority, we
are offering an
amendment to Canon 32 to
provide a process
whereby parishes may
leave the diocese in an
amicable and Christian
manner.”
As the pastor and
chief shepherd of this
Diocese, I want to
underscore that point:
the purpose of the
proposed amendment to
Canon 32 is pastoral.
It is intended to
provide a process and
canonical means whereby
a parish that determines
that, in good
conscience, it must
separate from the
Diocese, may do so with
its buildings and
assets. Each case,
of course, will be
slightly different.
Every parish will find
some who support the
direction of the Diocese
and some who oppose it,
whatever path we choose.
The proposed Canon
provides a process that
would allow for the
possibility of
reconciliation, and if
that is not possible,
then an amicable
solution to the
controversy, where the
positions of all sides
are respected. It
is my fervent hope that
no parish will elect to
pursue this course and
that we will remain
together in mission for
the next 25 years and
beyond. But if
separation must come,
let it be accomplished
without rancor and
litigation. Let it
be done in a Godly
manner, in charity and
in peace. Let it
be a parting of brothers
and sisters in Christ.
On numerous occasions, I
have said that I cannot
make anyone leave the
Episcopal Church, nor
can I make anyone stay
in the Episcopal Church.
This is a very difficult
time for all of us, and
it does not help to
demonize one another or
to attack the integrity
or motives of those who
disagree with us.
It is not a time for
threats, intimidation,
or coercion. It is
a time for grace,
cooperation, and mutual
respect. The
multiple lawsuits that
have been filed across
the United States by The
Episcopal Church against
good Christian people
over the ownership of
their church property
are outrageous. It
is a scandal to the Body
of Christ, and it must
stop! This is not
the way Christians deal
with one another.
|
|
Tomorrow morning,
after our votes have
been cast today, your
local church will remain
unchanged. You
will have the same
priest, same building,
same Prayer Book, and
all the rest, that you
had last Sunday.
And I would like to say
a word of reassurance to
all of you, if I may,
that this also will be
the most likely scenario
next year, following a
possible ratification
vote on any proposals
that we adopt on first
reading today.
Your church and your
priest will still be
there for you and your
family. The
liturgy and worship in
your congregation will
continue as it has in
years past, edifying the
faithful and giving
glory to God. Any
and all who wish to join
us will still be warmly
welcomed, and we will
continue to reach out to
the world about us in
evangelism and witness
to the saving Gospel of
Jesus Christ. Do
not be fearful; trust
God to provide. Do
not vote today out of
fear, but out of
conviction, in
confidence and in faith.
Last week, I
celebrated my 33rd
anniversary of
ordination to the sacred
priesthood. I
joyfully reaffirm before
all of you my ordination
vows “to be loyal to the
doctrine, discipline,
and worship of Christ as
this Church has received
them.” In the
Spring, I will celebrate
the 15th anniversary of
my consecration to serve
as your Bishop. I
joyfully reaffirm before
all of you that I will
continue to “guard the
faith, unity, and
discipline of the
Church,” to the best of
my ability and with
God’s grace. From
time to time someone
will ask, “Why don’t you
just resign and go away
and join some other
church where you will be
happy?” My reply is
always the same; because
I cannot forsake the
faithful people of this
Diocese. I cannot
renounce the sacred vows
I took when I was called
by God to serve as your
Bishop. I will not
desert the flock that
has called me to
shepherd them in this
Diocese. I will not
cease to guard the
faith. I will not
forsake those who look
to me for spiritual
leadership and guidance.
As Jesus himself said,
it is the hireling who,
when he sees the wolf
coming, runs away and
abandons the sheep.
The good shepherd
remains to defend and
lead the sheep entrusted
to his protection and
care. I am not
going to abandon the
faithful of this Diocese
in the midst of the
assaults and threats
being hurled at us for
standing up for what we
believe.
The controversies and
divisions that confront
us are not about me or
about my role as Bishop.
They are about the truth
of the Gospel, the
authority of the Bible,
and the received
teachings of the
apostolic Church.
My theological positions
have not changed on any
of the issues that are
before us.
Likewise, this Diocese
has not deviated from
the historic faith and
order of the catholic
Church. We are not
the cause of division or
schism; we are a part of
the solution. We
are a part of the
realignment that is
shaking up and reshaping
the Anglican world.
We are for preserving
the unity of the Church
and for mending the tear
in the fabric of our
beloved Communion.
For all these reasons,
our commitment to
Christian orthodoxy must
remain clear and
unwavering. We
will make common cause
with all who share this
faith, these values, and
this mission. The
proposals before this
Convention have one
clear message: We
here in the Episcopal
Diocese of Fort Worth
intend to be who we have
always been, to believe
what we have always
believed, and to do what
we have always done.
We will remain an
orthodox diocese of
catholic Christians,
full members of the
worldwide Anglican
Communion. Above all
else, we are committed
to serving and obeying
the Lord Jesus Christ,
as we uphold the
authority of the Holy
Scriptures as the
revealed Word of God and
our ultimate authority
in all matters of faith,
morals and doctrine.
If that makes us enemies
of some, if that brings
on threats and
intimidations, if that
brings on militant
opposition – then so be
it. We will face
it together, as God
gives us His grace and
guidance.
|
My
dream is for a day when
we are not under attack
by adversaries from
within the same church
or engulfed in endless
religious
controversies. I long
to be a part of a
Province that wants us
and values our witness,
instead of threatening
us and isolating us as a
“problem diocese.” My
hope is for a time when
we are not sidetracked
from the mission of the
Church by endless
conflicts, so that we
can be truly set free to
focus on making
disciples, planting new
churches, building up
the Body, equipping the
saints for ministry,
encouraging the
faithful, and doing the
work of Jesus Christ in
the world. May God in
His goodness hasten the
arrival of such a day,
such a time, and such a
Church.
|
|
|
<
|
|
|
|